Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128 GB) vs Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64 GB)

Framework Desktop 128 GB has 128 GB memory, 256 GB/s bandwidth, 140 W nominal power; Framework Desktop 64 GB has 64 GB memory, 256 GB/s bandwidth, 120 W nominal power. Compare model compatibility, like-for-like tokens/sec and ownership cost below.

Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128 GB) · Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64 GB)

Verdict
  • throughputNo valid like-for-like performance comparison is available. The practical configurations below differ in quantization, runtime, context, settings, or evidence type, so their speed difference must not be attributed to hardware alone.
  • capacityBoth machines run all 8 compared models in their best practical configurations. Compare their quantizations and evidence labels before treating any throughput difference as a hardware result.
  • costAt 8 hours a day, the Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64 GB) has approximately 98% lower total monthly cost ($1 against $28), for a C corporation in United States (federal).
  • evidenceThere are no comparable throughput rows, so this page makes no hardware-speed ranking. Practical deployment figures remain useful for fit planning but answer a different question.
  • recommendationThroughput is close enough to be a wash, so this comes down to cost and capacity: the Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64 GB) is cheaper to own, and capacity differences above decide which models you can run at all.
Every statement above is generated from the calculations on this page by fixed rules — no prose is written for individual comparisons. If the numbers change, the verdict changes with them.
Hardware
Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128 GB)Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64 GB)
Purchase price estimate$2,161 *—
Memory128 GB64 GB
Memory bandwidth256 GB/s256 GB/s
Usable bandwidth indicator123 GB/s (48%)123 GB/s (48%)
Nominal power140 W120 W
Measured load power130 W—
Idle power12 W—
Architectureigpu unifiedigpu unified
Like-for-like performance0 comparable models
Mixtral 8x7BPhi-3.5 MoE 42B-A6.6BNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3BQwen3-Coder 30B-A3BQwen3 30B-A3BGemma 4 26B-A4Bgpt-oss-20bDeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16B-A2.4B
ModelFramework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128 GB)Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64 GB)Winner
Mixtral 8x7B
46.703B (13B active)
—
no matched configuration
—
no matched configuration
Not comparable
Phi-3.5 MoE 42B-A6.6B
41.873B (6.6B active)
—
no matched configuration
—
no matched configuration
Not comparable
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B
31.578B (3B active)
—
no matched configuration
—
no matched configuration
Not comparable
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B
30.532B (3.3B active)
—
no matched configuration
—
no matched configuration
Not comparable
Qwen3 30B-A3B
30.532B (3.3B active)
—
no matched configuration
—
no matched configuration
Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B-A4B
25.806B (3.8B active)
—
no matched configuration
—
no matched configuration
Not comparable
gpt-oss-20b
20.915B (3.6B active)
—
no matched configuration
—
no matched configuration
Not comparable
DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16B-A2.4B
15.706B (2.4B active)
—
no matched configuration
—
no matched configuration
Not comparable
Hardware deltas are calculated only when quantization, runtime, exact context, execution/decode mode and relevant inference settings match. Measured and estimated results are never compared to each other. A difference under 10% is reported as a tie.
Best practical configuration
ModelFramework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128 GB)Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64 GB)Practical result
Mixtral 8x7B—
Q8_0 · estimated
—
Q5_K_M · estimated
Both fit; configurations may differ
Phi-3.5 MoE 42B-A6.6B—
Q8_0 · estimated
—
Q5_K_M · estimated
Both fit; configurations may differ
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B~25.7–37 t/s
Q8_0 · estimated
—
Q8_0 · estimated
Both fit; configurations may differ
Qwen3-Coder 30B-A3B~23.5–33.8 t/s
Q8_0 · estimated
—
Q8_0 · estimated
Both fit; configurations may differ
Qwen3 30B-A3B~23.5–33.8 t/s
Q8_0 · estimated
—
Q8_0 · estimated
Both fit; configurations may differ
Gemma 4 26B-A4B~20.5–29.5 t/s
Q8_0 · estimated
—
Q8_0 · estimated
Both fit; configurations may differ
gpt-oss-20b~41.6–59.8 t/s
MXFP4 · estimated
—
MXFP4 · estimated
Both fit; configurations may differ
DeepSeek Coder V2 Lite 16B-A2.4B—
Q8_0 · estimated
—
Q8_0 · estimated
Both fit; configurations may differ
This is a deployment comparison: each machine uses its own recommended configuration. Different quantizations can change speed and quality, so these figures are not raw hardware benchmarks.
Economics — United States (federal), C corporation, 8h/day
Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128 GB)Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64 GB)
Purchase price estimate$2,161—
Reclaimable VAT$0$0
Net cash at purchase$2,161$0
Monthly depreciation$30.62$0.00
Monthly electricity$0.88 (6 kWh)$0.88 (6 kWh)
Tax programme§179 100.0%§179 100.0%
Tax-programme benefit$454$0
Monthly economic cost$27.89$0.69
Total over 5 years$1,673$41
Purchase prices are localized inputs in USD: tax/VAT excluded for Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128 GB) and tax/VAT excluded for Framework Desktop (Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 64 GB). Net cash and monthly economic cost then apply the selected United States (federal) / C corporation tax treatment. Tax assumptions last verified 2026-09-07. Federal planning estimate only, not tax advice. State and local income tax, sales/use tax and incentives are excluded. It assumes 100% business use, a Section 179 election, enough business income to use it, and that the full annual limit remains available.