Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on Dual RTX 5090 workstation (2x 32 GB)
31.578B (3B active) on 64 GB at 3,584 GB/s. Hardware details · Model details
Yes. Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B fits on Dual RTX 5090 workstation (2x 32 GB) at the recommended
Q8_0 configuration, requiring approximately 34.3 GB at 8K context. Practical context capacity is 1M. Expected decode for the recommended configuration is ~249–359 t/s. EstimatedCompatibilityComfortable
Calculated fit
Yes
Calculated Uses under 80% of usable memory. Room for a long context and other work.
Recommended quantization
Q8_0
Calculated gguf
Memory required
34.3 GB
Calculated of 56.3 GB usable — 61%
Max practical context
1M
Calculated model supports 1M
Memory budget at 8K context
Model weights ⓘ
31.9 GB Calculated
KV cache ⓘ
0.1 GB Calculated
Runtime overhead ⓘ
2.4 GB Estimated
Total required
34.3 GB Calculated
Headroom ⓘ
22.0 GB Calculated
Highest-precision quantization that leaves headroom: uses 61% of usable memory at 8K context.
2 GPUs providing 64 GB aggregate VRAM. Assumes tensor- or layer-parallel sharding; each GPU carries its own context and communication buffers.
Mixture of experts: all 31.578B parameters must be resident in memory even though only ~3B are active per token. Memory follows total parameters; speed follows active parameters.
Hybrid cache: token-growing KV memory is charged only to 6 attention blocks; 23 Mamba-2 blocks use fixed-size convolution and recurrent state instead.
Multi-GPU throughput depends heavily on interconnect. Without NVLink or NVSwitch, tensor parallelism over PCIe adds latency that partially offsets the extra bandwidth.
Performance
Estimated performance · recommended Q8_0
Decode, prefill and TTFT below are estimates for Q8_0. We do not have a comparable Q8_0 measurement on this machine.
Estimated decode
~249–359 t/s
Estimated Q8_0; calculated range
Estimated prefill
~5150–10690 t/s
Estimated Q8_0; calculated range
Estimated TTFT at 8K
~0.8–1.7 s
Estimated Q8_0; calculated range
Hardware load reference
1180 W
Measured machine-level load; not this model run
How the estimate is calculated
- Multi-GPU: 1792 GB/s per card, with each additional card contributing 40% of its bandwidth — 2509 GB/s effective, not the 3584 GB/s aggregate. Cross-GPU collectives use PCIe rather than a dedicated GPU fabric.
- Decode: reading 3.0B active parameters at 8.50 bits/weight takes 1.60 ms at 2509 GB/s x 79% achieved efficiency.
- MoE routing penalty of 15% applied: expert gathers are less bandwidth-efficient than a dense sweep.
- Per-token overhead of 1.4 ms (kernel launches, attention bookkeeping, sampling) is significant here — this model is not purely bandwidth-bound on this hardware.
- Prefill: 419 TFLOPS (FP16) x 2 for native FP8 tensor cores x 0.71 calibrated against measured prefill on this platform x 26% assumed model-FLOPs utilisation, divided by 2 x 9.7B parameters per token.
- Prefill uses 9.7B effective parameters, not the 3B active in decode: a batch of hundreds of tokens routes across most of the expert pool.
- MoE decode depends on how well the engine batches expert gathers; real results vary more than for dense models.
- With few active parameters on fast memory, fixed per-token overhead rather than bandwidth sets the ceiling. Real engines vary widely in how well they hide it.
- Prefill throughput is highly engine-dependent. Flash attention, batch size and quantized KV all move this number substantially, and for sparse mixture-of-experts models it is the least reliable figure we produce.
- This is a calculated estimate, not a measurement. It assumes a single request, a short prompt, no speculative decoding and a warm model already resident in memory.
Estimator version estimator_v1. Stored with every estimated row so old estimates can be regenerated when the model improves.
Submit a benchmarkSubmissions stay pending until reviewed.
This model at other quantizations on this machine
| Quantization | Resident | Disk | Total needed | Utilisation | Fit | Max context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q4_K_M | 18.4 GB | 18.4 GB | 20.4 GB | 36% | Comfortable | 1M |
Q5_K_M | 21.5 GB | 21.5 GB | 23.7 GB | 42% | Comfortable | 1M |
Q8_0recommended | 31.9 GB | 31.9 GB | 34.3 GB | 61% | Comfortable | 1M |
BF16 | 58.8 GB | 58.8 GB | 62.1 GB | 110% | Does not fit | 0 |
Cost of running Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on this machineUnited States (federal) · C corporation · 8h/day
Monthly economic cost
$80
Calculated after tax
Codex/Claude Code
$100/mo
≈ $100/mo · local is $20 less
Net cash at purchase
$5,854
Calculated VAT not reclaimable
Total over 5 years
$4,799
Calculated after tax, after resale
Cost per USD/1M tokens
$2.08
Calculated 38.5M tokens/month
The $100 comparison uses the Codex Pro 5x / Claude Max 5x plans. A fixed planning conversion is used for USD. This compares monthly spend only: subscriptions have usage limits, local hardware has different capabilities and constraints, and taxes or regional pricing may change the charged amount. Prices checked 7 September 2026.
Purchase-price input: $5,854 in United States (federal), tax/VAT excluded · estimated · NL retail (system build) (converted catalogue estimate). This is the localized purchase input; the after-tax economic cost is calculated separately below.
Monthly breakdown
| Depreciation 4,976 over 5 years, straight-line to a 878 residual | $82.94 |
| Electricity 57.0 kWh/month at 0.140/kWh | $7.98 |
| Cost of capital 4.0%/yr on 3,366 average capital employed | $11.22 |
| Monthly cost before tax | $102.14 |
| Electricity tax shield Running costs are deductible business expenses | −$1.68 |
| First-year expensing §179 (100.0%) | −$20.49 |
| Monthly economic cost after tax | $79.98 |
Three different numbers, deliberately
Cash cost
$5,854
Money that leaves the bank account on day one, net of reclaimable VAT.
Accounting depreciation
$82.94/month
$4,976 written down over 5 years to a $878 residual.
After-tax economic cost
$79.98/month
Depreciation plus running costs plus cost of capital, less the tax those deductions save. This is the figure to compare between machines.
Assumptions and sources (verified 2026-09-07)
VAT rate
0% Official spec
VAT recoverable
0% Official spec
Federal C-corporation estimate at the flat 21% rate. Pass-through entities should use the sole-proprietor estimate as a rougher proxy.
Effective deduction rate
21.00% Calculated
Headline marginal rate 21.00%.
Depreciation
5 years, straight-line Assumption
Residual value
$878 (15%) Assumption
Two GPU generations later, the card is worth a fraction of its list price.
Electricity
$0.140/kWh Assumption
Average power draw
324 W Calculated
Load 1180 W for 20% of powered hours, idle 110 W for the rest — a machine that is on is not generating tokens the whole time.
Investment allowances
§179 100.0% Official spec
Worth $1,229 in total — first-year expensing that replaces later tax depreciation.
Cost of capital
$11.22/month Assumption
- VAT rate: No US federal VAT · verified 2026-09-07
- Marginal tax rate: IRS Publication 542 — Corporations · verified 2026-09-07
- VAT recoverable fraction: site assumption · verified 2026-09-07
- Useful life: IRS Publication 946 — How To Depreciate Property · verified 2026-09-07
- Electricity price: Site assumption · verified 2026-09-07
Assumes the machine generates tokens 20% of its 176 powered hours per month. Cost per token scales inversely with this number — halve the utilisation and the cost per token doubles.
Federal planning estimate only, not tax advice. State and local income tax, sales/use tax and incentives are excluded. It assumes 100% business use, a Section 179 election, enough business income to use it, and that the full annual limit remains available.
Efficiency metrics
Decode per $1,000 spent
52.0 t/s
Calculated purchase price only
Decode per $100/month
380.3 t/s
Calculated after-tax ownership cost
Tokens per joule
0.94
Calculated same as tokens/s per watt
USD per 1M output tokens
$2.08
Calculated at 20% utilisation
Local versus hosted APIs
| Hosted model | USD/1M output | Break-even | API at your volume | Verdict | Comparison type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Flash Alibaba Cloud | $0.42 | 51.9M/mo | $59 | API cheaper | Different model |
| DeepSeek-V4.1 Flash DeepSeek | $0.60 | 44.4M/mo | $69 | API cheaper | Different model |
| DeepSeek-V4 Pro DeepSeek | $1.98 | 11.0M/mo | $280 | Local cheaper | Different model |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (Together) Together AI | $4.40 | 3.8M/mo | $817 | Local cheaper | Different model |
| GLM-5.3 Z.ai | $4.40 | 5.1M/mo | $601 | Local cheaper | Different model |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic | $5.00 | 6.2M/mo | $501 | Local cheaper | Different model |
Different-model comparison: the hosted model is not the model you would run locally. Treat this as a workload-quality trade-off, not a direct economic equivalence — the frontier model may complete a task in fewer tokens, or complete tasks the local model cannot. Break-even is the monthly output volume at which API spend equals the $80/month economic cost of owning this machine, assuming 8 input tokens per output token. Hosted prices are published in USD. This table is the canonical US default.
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on other hardware
| Hardware | Decode | Price | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA DGX H200 (8x H200, 1,128 GB) | ~533–768 t/s | $359,430 * | Comfortable |
| RTX 5090 workstation (1x 32 GB) | ~319–459 t/s | $3,332 * | Comfortable |
| Quad RTX 5090 workstation (4x 32 GB) | ~315–454 t/s | $12,611 * | Comfortable |
| Lenovo ThinkStation PX (4x RTX PRO 6000, 384 GB) | ~293–422 t/s | $58,553 * | Comfortable |
| Used RTX 4090 workstation (24 GB) | ~237–342 t/s | $2,071 * | Borderline |
| Dell Precision 7960 Rack (2x RTX PRO 6000, 192 GB) | ~236–339 t/s | $36,663 * | Comfortable |
Nearest alternatives to the Dual RTX 5090 workstation (2x 32 GB)
Nemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on RTX 5090 workstation (1x 32 GB)32 GBNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on Quad RTX 5090 workstation (4x 32 GB)128 GBNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on Dual used RTX 4090 workstation (48 GB)48 GBNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell workstation (96 GB)96 GBNemotron 3.5 Lightning 30B-A3B on RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q workstation (96 GB, 300 W)96 GB
Compare Dual RTX 5090 workstation (2x 32 GB) against RTX 5090 workstation (1x 32 GB) →
Compare Dual RTX 5090 workstation (2x 32 GB) against RTX 5090 workstation (1x 32 GB) →