Qwen3.8 27B on RTX 3090 workstation (Ryzen 9 7950X, 64 GB)
27.781B on 24 GB at 936 GB/s. Hardware details · Model details
Q4_K_M configuration, requiring approximately 18.1 GB at 8K context. Practical context capacity is 32K. Measured alternative: 74.88 t/s median across 1 comparable run at Q5_K_M and 1K context. MeasuredMemory budget at 8K context
Estimated performance · recommended Q4_K_M
Decode, prefill and TTFT below are estimates for Q4_K_M. We do not have a comparable Q4_K_M measurement on this machine.
Measured results · Q5_K_M
4 measured runsThese are real Q5_K_M measurements. The recommendation above uses Q4_K_M, so they are not used to produce its estimated KPIs.
| Quant | Engine | Decode mode | Context | Runs | Median decode | Median prefill | Latest | Sources |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q5_K_M | llama.cpp | MTP | 1K | 1 | 74.88 t/s | — | 25 Aug 2026 | — |
Q5_K_M | llama.cpp | MTP | 16K | 1 | 70.15 t/s | — | 25 Aug 2026 | — |
Q5_K_M | llama.cpp | MTP | 63K | 1 | 56.58 t/s | — | 25 Aug 2026 | — |
Q5_K_M | llama.cpp | MTP | 90K | 1 | 42.71 t/s | — | 25 Aug 2026 | — |
How the estimate is calculated
- Decode: reading 27.8B active parameters at 4.85 bits/weight takes 23.99 ms at 936 GB/s x 75% achieved efficiency.
- Prefill: 142 TFLOPS (FP16) x 32% assumed model-FLOPs utilisation, divided by 2 x 27.8B parameters per token.
- Prefill throughput is highly engine-dependent. Flash attention, batch size and quantized KV all move this number substantially, and for sparse mixture-of-experts models it is the least reliable figure we produce.
- This is a calculated estimate, not a measurement. It assumes a single request, a short prompt, no speculative decoding and a warm model already resident in memory.
Estimator version estimator_v1. Stored with every estimated row so old estimates can be regenerated when the model improves.
| Quantization | Resident | Disk | Total needed | Utilisation | Fit | Max context |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Q4_K_Mrecommended | 16.2 GB | 16.2 GB | 18.1 GB | 82% | Fits | 32K |
Q5_K_M | 19.0 GB | 19.0 GB | 21.0 GB | 95% | BorderlineResident run observed | 8K |
Q8_0 | 28.0 GB | 28.0 GB | 30.4 GB | 138% | Does not fit | 0 |
BF16 | 51.7 GB | 51.7 GB | 54.8 GB | 248% | Does not fit | 0 |
The $100 comparison uses the Codex Pro 5x / Claude Max 5x plans. A fixed planning conversion is used for USD. This compares monthly spend only: subscriptions have usage limits, local hardware has different capabilities and constraints, and taxes or regional pricing may change the charged amount. Prices checked 7 September 2026.
Monthly breakdown
| Depreciation 1,545 over 5 years, straight-line to a 436 residual | $25.75 |
| Electricity 31.3 kWh/month at 0.140/kWh | $4.38 |
| Cost of capital 4.0%/yr on 1,208 average capital employed | $4.03 |
| Monthly cost before tax | $34.16 |
| Electricity tax shield Running costs are deductible business expenses | −$0.92 |
| First-year expensing §179 (100.0%) | −$6.93 |
| Monthly economic cost after tax | $26.30 |
Three different numbers, deliberately
Assumptions and sources (verified 2026-09-07)
- VAT rate: No US federal VAT · verified 2026-09-07
- Marginal tax rate: IRS Publication 542 — Corporations · verified 2026-09-07
- VAT recoverable fraction: site assumption · verified 2026-09-07
- Useful life: IRS Publication 946 — How To Depreciate Property · verified 2026-09-07
- Electricity price: Site assumption · verified 2026-09-07
| Hosted model | USD/1M output | Break-even | API at your volume | Verdict | Comparison type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Flash Alibaba Cloud | $0.42 | 17.1M/mo | $8 | API cheaper | Different model |
| DeepSeek-V4.1 Flash DeepSeek | $0.60 | 14.6M/mo | $9 | API cheaper | Different model |
| DeepSeek-V4 Pro DeepSeek | $1.98 | 3.6M/mo | $37 | Local cheaper | Different model |
| DeepSeek V4 Pro (Together) Together AI | $4.40 | 1.2M/mo | $108 | Local cheaper | Different model |
| GLM-5.3 Z.ai | $4.40 | 1.7M/mo | $80 | Local cheaper | Different model |
| Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic | $5.00 | 2.0M/mo | $66 | Local cheaper | Different model |
| Hardware | Decode | Price | Fit |
|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA DGX H200 (8x H200, 1,128 GB) | ~331–476 t/s | $359,430 * | Comfortable |
| Quad RTX 5090 workstation (4x 32 GB) | ~75.5–109 t/s | $12,611 * | Comfortable |
| Lenovo ThinkStation PX (4x RTX PRO 6000, 384 GB) | ~66.1–95.1 t/s | $58,553 * | Comfortable |
| RTX 5090 workstation (1x 32 GB) | ~55.7–80.1 t/s | $3,332 * | Comfortable |
| Dual RTX 5090 workstation (2x 32 GB) | ~50.4–72.6 t/s | $5,854 * | Comfortable |
| Dell Precision 7960 Rack (2x RTX PRO 6000, 192 GB) | ~46.2–66.5 t/s | $36,663 * | Comfortable |
Compare RTX 3090 workstation (Ryzen 9 7950X, 64 GB) against Used RTX 4090 workstation (24 GB) →